is this considered art?

I started making logo designs, my first client is a person who wants to do freelance international law consulting services, he was like "yo i want an owl because knowledge and stuff" so i was like "sure dude i'll make your owl"

i did make another 2 proposals but they're logotypes, no symbols or anything.

"OWL give you a good owl logo!" DID YOU SAY THAT?!

This is cute! I can see the one of the left on printed on a door in an open office setting next to his law consulting brand name. xD

final form(s)


I now understand how some graphic designers feel about their clients, but it's his passion project and he doesn't know how to use illustrator so yeah... after 5 hours of details, he is satisfied.

And now he wants it animated :eyes: $$

"Well..."

According to my Theory of Knowledge course, anything can be considered art if it:

1. surpasses the test of time (when does it become (ir)relevant?)
   
2. has purpose/intent (why was it created?)
   
3. one's audience can comprehend/appreciate it (how does one's audience feel?)
   
4. is universal (will it appeal to everyone?)
   

The design, in my opinion, looks better in a circle and I like the yellow color, too. ^^ Can't wait to see it animated. :eyes: :moneybag: :thisaintdiscord:

No.

It might be just me but the colour just doesn't seem to fit the owl.
It would look cool if it was half bkack half yellow